Estonia is often cited as the Baltic reference thanks to the media success of its e-residency programme. But for an entrepreneur forming a Latvian SIA, Latvia adopted the same tax model back in 2018, and takes the lead on several concrete points: costs, banking, dedicated support. Here's the numbers-based comparison, with no sales pitch.
Taxation: two near-identical models
This is the point to understand from the outset: corporate taxation is structurally the same in Latvia and Estonia. Both countries apply deferred taxation on distribution, not on profit:
- Estonia (OÜ): 0% on undistributed profits, 22% on distributions (22/78 base), in force since 2000
- Latvia (SIA): 0% on undistributed profits, 20% on distributions (effective rate around 25% of the net amount), in force since 2018
Latvia explicitly modelled itself on Estonia. Comparing the two countries on taxation alone therefore isn't very meaningful — it's nearly a tie. The slightly lower distribution rate in Latvia tips the balance just a touch. For the full mechanism, see our page on the corporate tax rate.
Estonian e-residency: real advantage or marketing effect?
This is the most cited argument in Estonia's favour. E-residency lets you obtain a digital Estonian ID card to sign electronically and form a company remotely. Technically impressive, but often misunderstood.
A misconception to correct
Estonian e-residency confers no tax status whatsoever. It's not a tax residency, it doesn't reduce your personal income tax back home, and it doesn't automatically grant access to Estonia's tax regime. An OÜ formed via e-residency remains subject to the same permanent-establishment rules as a Latvian SIA.
In practice, e-residency mainly serves digital nomads who want to centralise a European digital identity. For most entrepreneurs, it isn't a decisive advantage, just a different formation formality.
The numbers-based comparison, point by point
| Criteria | Latvia (SIA) | Estonia (OÜ) |
|---|---|---|
| CIT on reinvested profits | 0% | 0% |
| CIT on distributed profits | 20% (effective ~25% of net) | 22% (22/78 base) |
| Minimum capital | €1 (micro) / €2,800 (standard) | €0.01 |
| VAT | 21% | 24% |
| Formation time | 2 to 5 business days | 1 to 3 days (via e-Residency) |
| Opening a bank account | Relatively accessible | Difficult for non-residents |
| Remote signing | Notarised power of attorney | e-Residency (digital card) |
| EU / Eurozone / Schengen | Yes / Yes / Yes | Yes / Yes / Yes |
| OECD member | Yes | Yes |
| Typical annual costs | €1,500 – 3,000 | €2,000 – 4,000 |
Verdict
Same tax model, but Latvia is slightly cheaper on distribution and annual use, and easier for opening a real business bank account. Estonia keeps the edge on speed of fully online formation.
Dedicated support: a decisive advantage in practice
This may be the most important criterion in practice, and the one where Latvia takes the clearest lead. In Estonia, most service providers specialised in company formation for non-residents work in English only, with little support in other major European languages. Yet the subtleties of cross-border taxation (bilateral treaties, dividend withholding, foreign-holding declarations, permanent-establishment risk) require expertise that goes well beyond translation. Our team supports international entrepreneurs from the first exchange to annual accounting, with dedicated, personalised guidance throughout.
Advantages of Latvia and Estonia
Advantages of Latvia
- Lower formation and annual management costs
- More accessible business bank account opening
- Much more developed international support ecosystem
- Slightly lower VAT (21% vs 24%)
Advantages of Estonia
- 100% online formation within hours, no notary
- Symbolic minimum capital (€0.01)
- Well-established tech and startup ecosystem in Tallinn
- Unique digital identity in Europe (e-Residency)
Who Latvia is the best choice for
If you want support in your own language, a contact who understands cross-border tax issues, controlled annual management costs, and a real business bank account without complications, Latvia is the most rational choice. That's also true if day-to-day accounting simplicity matters more to you than initial formation speed.
Who Estonia may suit better
Estonia still makes sense if you're a digital nomad mainly after e-residency to centralise your European digital identity, if you're perfectly comfortable in English and don't need dedicated support, or if you're building a tech startup with a real need for proximity to Tallinn's ecosystem.
"Between Latvia and Estonia, the choice isn't made on taxation, it's identical. It's made on costs, banking, and support. For most international entrepreneurs, Latvia generally offers the best support-to-value ratio."
Go further
Weighing a country outside the Baltics? See our comparison Latvia vs Portugal, or our broader guide on the best country to set up a company in Europe.
Frequently asked questions
Ready to set up your SIA in Latvia?
Free consultation with an expert. Response within 24h, no commitment.
Request my quote View our packagesCompare Latvia to other countries
Every country has its own strengths. Explore the other comparisons to refine your choice.
